I’m just a tiny blog that no one reads (except you :). And yet in the past few days I’ve started getting 10-20 trackback spams a day. So I’m disabling trackbacks. *sigh*
Tips welcome on what to do about that crap.
I’m just a tiny blog that no one reads (except you :). And yet in the past few days I’ve started getting 10-20 trackback spams a day. So I’m disabling trackbacks. *sigh*
Tips welcome on what to do about that crap.
On my old iPhone 1G (which I’ve replaced with a 3GS) it turns out you can enable “airplane mode” (so the phone isn’t constantly searching for a cellular signal it’ll never find) but still turn on WiFi. Cool.
Well, I tried to take a couple of polls at FB, and they hung up on me (perhaps because of my paranoid cookie settings), and I tried to post this on my wall, but it was too long, so I’ll just say it here:
In no particular order (and for no particular reason …) :
Search engine: Google
Browser: Opera
Mail: GMail
Task lists: Remember The Milk (rmilk.com)
News (sort of): Reddit.com
Goofing off (definitely): Reddit.com (though lately Facebook (shudder) comes in a close second)
I’ve thought a lot about axioms (things believed to be true without proof) in the context of personal philosophy. The only one I’ve come up with so far, for myself, personally, is “I can derive accurate information about reality via my senses.” Not necessarily perfect, and not necessarily complete, but, on the whole, over time, accurate. Call this Axiom 1.
(Actually, I also include, for completeness, “I exist”. Some philosophers get touchy about this one. Call this Axiom 0.)
What axioms do you have, if any, that do not follow from this one?
As an example, I’ve considered adding to the list “Both inductive and deductive reasoning can yield valid statements about reality”, but I haven’t, because I believe you can show empirically (by observing reality with your senses) that this is true.
Any thoughts?
Update: Wikipedia points out that “observations themselves do not establish the validity of inductive reasoning, except inductively. In other words, observations that inductive reasoning has worked in the past do not ensure that it will always work.” In more other words, induction cannot empirically prove itself. So maybe I do have to include induction, and possibly deduction, in an axiom.
After many years of using mutt in a terminal (which followed several years of using elm in a terminal), I’m switching to GMail. I like it already.
As an aside, since I’ve installed Movable Type and made blogging so much more easier than earlier, I’ve already blogged more in the last week than I’d blogged in the last year.
Unfortunately for you Lispers, none of it has been Lisp-related. Be patient. I’ll get back to that eventually.
I like it, in concept. I’ve liked the “mind map” idea since I ran into it.
Mind Raider is slow to move from note to note on my machine. Maybe it’s because my X server is running unaccelerated. (Which sucks for various reasons and is currently unavoidable.)
The deal killer for me was the note entry mode. If I want an item bolded I have to type <b></b>. To do other rich-text stuff you have to enter similar HTML. Ick. Won’t do it. Sorry, I’m picky.
Before I dismiss it completely I should probably check to see if there’s an actual rich-text editor plugin, though.
In the mean time, I’ll stick with TreePad.
… with a link to this one, in case the two(?) people following it on RSS still care. 🙂
So my next task, before I write too many entries, is to decide whether I want to use Movable Type to manage just my blog, or my entire site. I so dislike writing HTML. (Although I guess that’s a false dichotomy — there are lots of ways to avoid writing HTML.)